Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"Lon L Fuller's account of what he termed 'the internal morality of law' is widely accepted as the classic twentieth century statement of the principles of the rule of law. Much less accepted is his claim that a necessary connection between law and morality manifests in these principles, with the result that his jurisprudence largely continues to occupy a marginal place in the field of legal philosophy. In 'Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L Fuller', Kristen Rundle offers a close textual analysis of Fuller's published writings and working papers to explain how his claims about the internal morality of law belong to a wider exploration of the ways in which the distinctive form of law introduces meaningful limits to lawgiving power through its connection to human agency. By reading Fuller on his own terms, 'Forms Liberate' demonstrates why his challenge to a purely instrumental conception of law remains salient for twenty-first century legal scholarship."--Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fuller, Lon L. --- Fule, Lang, --- Fuller, Lon Luvois, --- Law --- Jurisprudence --- Law and ethics --- Ethics and law --- Law and morals --- Morals and law --- Philosophy --- E-books --- Jurisprudence. --- Law and ethics. --- Philosophy.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Natural Moral Law argues that the good can be known and that therefore the moral law, which serves as a basis for human choice, can be understood. Proceeding historically through ancient, modern and postmodern thinkers, Owen Anderson studies beliefs about the good and how it is known, and how such beliefs shape claims about the moral law. The focal challenge is whether the skepticism of postmodern thinkers can be answered in a way that preserves knowledge claims about the good. Considering the failures of modern thinkers to correctly articulate reason and the good and how postmodern thinkers are responding to these failures, Anderson argues that there are identifiable patterns of thinking about what is good, some of which lead to false dichotomies. The book concludes with a consideration of how a moral law might look if the good is correctly identified.

MODERN THINKERS -- 340.1 --- POSTMODERN THINKERS -- 340.1 --- NATURAL LAW -- 340.1 --- LAW AND ETHICS -- 340.1 --- ANCIENT THINKERS -- 340.1 --- Natural law --- Law and ethics --- Ethics and law --- Law and morals --- Morals and law --- Law --- Law of nature (Law) --- Natural rights --- Nature, Law of (Law) --- Rights, Natural --- Philosophy --- General and Others --- Natural law. --- Law and ethics.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Contingent fees --- Attorneys general --- Law and ethics. --- Conflict of interests --- Actions and defenses --- Justice, Administration of --- Moral and ethical aspects --- Corrupt practices

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

The Natural Moral Law argues that the good can be known and that therefore the moral law, which serves as a basis for human choice, can be understood. Proceeding historically through ancient, modern and postmodern thinkers, Owen Anderson studies beliefs about the good and how it is known, and how such beliefs shape claims about the moral law. The focal challenge is whether the skepticism of postmodern thinkers can be answered in a way that preserves knowledge claims about the good. Considering the failures of modern thinkers to correctly articulate reason and the good and how postmodern thinkers are responding to these failures, Anderson argues that there are identifiable patterns of thinking about what is good, some of which lead to false dichotomies. The book concludes with a consideration of how a moral law might look if the good is correctly identified.

Natural law. --- Law and ethics. --- Ethics and law --- Law and morals --- Morals and law --- Law --- Law of nature (Law) --- Natural rights --- Nature, Law of (Law) --- Rights, Natural --- Philosophy --- General and Others

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Economic Morality and Jewish Law compares the way in which welfare economics and Jewish law determine the propriety of an economic action, whether by a private citizen or the government. Espousing what philosophers would call a consequentialist ethical system, welfare economics evaluates the worthiness of an economic action based on whether the action would increase the wealth of society in the long run. In sharp contrast, Jewish law espouses a deontological system of ethics. Within this ethical system, the determination of the propriety of an action is entirely a matter of discovering the app

Mishpat Ivri --- Economics --- Law and economics. --- Law and ethics. --- Jewish ethics. --- Economic aspects. --- Religious aspects --- Judaism. --- Ethics, Jewish --- Jews --- Ethics and law --- Law and morals --- Morals and law --- Economics and jurisprudence --- Economics and law --- Jurisprudence and economics --- Judaism and economics --- Mishpaṭ ha-ʻIvri --- Ethics --- Religious ethics --- Law --- Jurisprudence --- Jewish law --- Philosophy --- Jewish ethics --- Law and economics --- Law and ethics --- 241.66*1 --- 296*52 --- Economic theory --- Political economy --- Social sciences --- Economic man --- 296*52 Joodse ethiek: Halacha; Minhag (gewoonten); Tora --- Joodse ethiek: Halacha; Minhag (gewoonten); Tora --- 241.66*1 Theologische ethiek: beroepsethiek; zakenmoraal --- Theologische ethiek: beroepsethiek; zakenmoraal --- Religious aspects&delete& --- Judaism --- Economic aspects